How to terraform Mars for $10b in 10 years

Part of the series on common misconceptions in space journalism. A follow on from a previous post on terraforming.

As far as terraforming goes, I’ve recently been much more occupied with my startup Terraform Industries, but it still generalizes to creating technical and economic ways to continue the ancient human project of gardening our surroundings to be less unpleasant. By the time Terraform Industries has completed its mission on Earth we’ll have finally assumed intentional and granular control over the world’s carbon cycle and parts of its water cycle, and in turn its position of radiative equilibrium with respect to the sun – in other words, controlling the climate deliberately, rather than accidentally.

There are certain ethical quandaries associated with assuming this level of control over the world’s systems but, it is important to remember, humans have always modified their environment to the extent possible, including measurable impacts on climate that date to prehistoric times from forestry and hunting megafauna to extinction. What we can say is that atmospheric hydrocarbon synthesis will deliver more equitable, cleaner, cheaper energy at much lower environmental cost than the existing approaches.

The subject for this post is not Earth, but Mars. Mars is cold, dry, dusty and, in its present state, downright hostile to life. Part of the reason for this is that Mars is smaller than Earth and further from the sun. Yet Mars was warm and wet in the past, initially for an extended period shortly after its formation when the sun was seemingly too cool to produce enough heat. And later, perhaps in hundreds or thousands of discrete episodes the planet seems to have flipped between relatively short periods of active water cycling with oceans, lakes, rivers, rain, and snow, intermediated by longer dry spells, such as the one in which we find the planet today. It seems likely that these two states are relatively stable, though their relative prevalence would suggest that warm/wet deterministically reverts to cold/dry after a short period, perhaps due to mass high altitude glaciation on Tharsis leading to a runaway drop in albedo and reduction of water available to feed the water cycle.

Even a warmer and wetter Mars would still be hostile to life, as its atmosphere would be almost entirely CO2 and still relatively thin. But warming the planet and filling its lakes and seas is the first step along the way to finally achieving “open skies” with breathable air, and it’s the step I’ll talk about today. What active steps can humans take to flip the planet into a warm/wet state, and ideally stabilize it there over meaningful timescales?

As described in my previous blog among other sources, a number of methods have been discussed for terraforming Mars, including deliberately crashing an asteroid into the planet, nuking it, building autonomous greenhouse gas factories on the surface, and solar sails. Some of these are more plausible than others in terms of sheer technical feasibility. The key point, however, is that given time and capital scarcity, it is meaningful to ask “which method will give me the most additional Watts per $?”

In terms of heat available on Mars, the dominant source is the sun. At Mars’ orbit the sun drops roughly 600 W/m^2 onto the surface, or 21,600 TW over the entire planet, which is millions of times more than one could achieve via, e.g., running a series of nuclear reactors and dumping the heat. The trick is to find a way to enhance solar heating, hopefully inducing a runaway greenhouse effect. Under this model, initial efforts warm the planet to some critical level, which results in the atmosphere thickening enough to trap more heat, which in turn warms the planet with no additional further effort.

The greenhouse gas factory method produces powerful heat-trapping gasses such as perfluoropropane, whose absorption spectrum neatly plugs the gap left by CO2 and has millions of times more heating power per unit mass of gas produced than CO2. The major drawback of this approach is that it requires substantial mines and gas factories emplaced on the surface; small compared to terrestrial mines but large on a planet where humans have, to this point, excavated only a few cubic inches of material. If there was already a sizeable human population on Mars with some local industry, this would be merely extremely difficult. An entirely automated self-replicating nuclear powered robotic perfluorocarbon factory is, in my view, science fiction. Such a project could easily consume a trillion dollars and half a century in R&D before the first landing, let alone first burp of enhanced greenhouse gas.

In fact, when contemplating different options and the current and future discount for performing some operations on Earth, which has copious quantities of labor, materials, breathable air, and a well developed supply chain, I became interested in whether it would be possible to start the Mars terraforming process with zero in-space manufacturing or new technology. It is possible and unsurprisingly, basic calculations show that it would also be, by far, the cheapest approach. This is not so different to the observation that the cheapest way to provide power to a lunar base is to beam it from Earth.

I will describe the basic idea and then explore the implications in some detail.

The pitch is to mass produce small scale solar sails in terrestrial cell phone factories, launch them into Low(ish) Earth Orbit (LEO), and have them fly themselves to Mars where, hanging out near Sun-Mars L2, they would reflect additional sunlight onto the night side of the planet. I first wrote about this four years ago.

Diagram of sails reflecting sunlight onto the nighttime side of Mars, effectively increasing the angular extent of the sun and thereby raising the planet’s temperature. This blog needed a lot more diagrams than I had time so we get the whiteboard treatment.
Solar sails are mass produced and launched with existing technology and infrastructure, requiring no new technology or clean-sheet development. Yes, the rocket is half way through its gravity turn.

Solar sails are a little different to other kinds of spacecraft, and as of this writing 4 have been launched and operated in space. At 1 AU, they generate about 8 μN/m^2. Areal density therefore determines their maximum acceleration. For a 1 gsm sail of very thin aluminized mylar, max acceleration is 8 mm/s^2. This is about 0.001 g but there are a lot of seconds in a day – in principle 700 m/s of Δv/day. There are confounding effects but a sail with modest performance would be able to escape Earth and fly to Mars in a matter of months. Since atmospheric drag is also proportional to area, there is a minimum altitude (~800 km) below which solar sails will not be able to escape the Earth. Rotation can be used to deploy, steer, and stabilize a sail but also has complications, such as weird dynamics and a need for axial precession to maintain angle of attack while spiraling out of LEO.

Like sailboats, solar sails can “tack” to modify their net force direction and change orbital elements.

Each sail weighs 1000 g and covers 1000 m^2 (1gsm), so think of a cell phone that is mostly made of very thin space blanket, unfolded to cover a couple of basketball courts. At current prices, launch cost would be around $2000 while basic cell phone manufacturing cost is about $100. Long term both these numbers could be reduced quite a bit. A Starship-launched sail with even thinner sail material weighing just 250 g might cost only $50 to launch, while aggressive value engineering to remove superfluous features could see manufacturing cost fall to a similar value. For example, the solar sail needs a processor, camera (star tracker) and basic telemetry radio (2 W is plenty for WSPR-like error correction). It also needs the sail, some kind of large LCD panel to alter reflectivity and enable steering, and a solar photovoltaic cell for power, but it doesn’t need a display, buttons, lots of flash storage, an impact-resistant chassis or, it turns out, a battery. No miracles are required to fit the entire electronics package into a PCB the size of a basic Arduino.

Basic block diagram of one potential solar sail configuration.

1000 m^2 at Mars reflects roughly 600 kW of additional heat energy toward the planet. So for this system, the marginal cost per MW of heat is between $160 and $3500. A Starship launching 150 T would deliver 600,000 solar sails, or nearly half a TW of extra heat for just $60m. Foxconn and others produce hundreds of millions of cell phones every year, so if our solar sails tap the same supply chains and manufacturing processes, it should be possible to ship more than 100 TW of additional power to Mars every year.

Mars’ cross sectional area is about 36,000,000 km^2. 1000 sails add one additional square km to this tally. 150 million sails per year adds 150,000 km^2, which is an 0.4% increment in solar forcing. It is uncertain exactly how much extra heat is needed to heat Mars to the point where volatiles outgas from the regolith and trigger a positive feedback loop preventing radiative heat escape, but even if we brute force it, a decade of launches will increase the effective solar collection by 4% and, with 1.5 billion sails above Mars’ night sky, the view would be spectacular. As a rough estimate, a 4% increase in energy input would require 4% higher thermal radiation to achieve equilibrium, which depending on some geometric factors of order unity, would result in a 1% temperature increase, from 210 K to 212 K. This is twice what we’ve achieved with 250 years of industrial effort on Earth, burning a trillion tonnes of fossil fuels!

In fact, a solar sail placed near Sun-Mars L2 would have an apparent magnitude of about -0.75, similar to Polaris or Saturn, while billions of them filling a cloud with an angular extent of about 5 degrees would have thousands of sails per human eye pixel, creating a cloud of light like the Milky Way, only a substantially brighter echo of the reflected sun. While the surface brightness of this cloud would be only ~0.1% of the sun, the integrated brightness would be more than Earth’s Moon when full.

We can be smarter than diffuse light brute forcing. Given sufficient control of our sails, we may be able to focus the sun’s heat on discrete locations on the surface of Mars, heating and calcinating ancient carbonate deposits and greatly increasing the quantity of CO2 available for warming. The problem is all about leverage and a Watt of power directly reflected is good but not as good as a Watt of power spent releasing a couple of grams of fresh CO2 every hour, in addition to its own heat.

There are two additional points of interest to be covered: Earth orbit and Mars orbit.

On departure from Earth, the solar sails need only be launched high enough that the net thrust from solar pressure, which scales with area of the sail, exceeds net drag from the sail in the upper atmosphere, which also scales with the area of the sail. In practice, this is about 800 km, which is higher than the ISS but lower than the Iridium constellation. In order to enable continuous power and orbital boosting, the sails must be launched into a polar sun-synchronous orbit. These orbits form a family where Earth’s equatorial bulge causes precession that matches Earth’s rotation about the sun. As sun synchronous orbits match Earth’s 24 hour day rather than the 4 minute shorter sidereal day, they enable passes with consistent illumination and are popular for Earth observation.

Solar sails in sun-synchronous orbit above 800 km can continuously raise their orbit and never encounter the Earth’s shadow.

Sun synchronous orbits typically have an inclination of about 96 degrees, which increases slightly as perigee increases. In practice, our sails will be in high enough orbit and raising their orbits quickly enough that even though they have sufficient thrust to adjust their inclination they don’t actually need to. If they accelerate away from Earth quickly enough (over a few months) then their orbit need never pass through Earth’s shadow, removing the need for the complexity of batteries.

This diagram shows how a sail flying in a polar SSO can continually thrust to raise its orbit, provided the sail can rotate once around the Sun-Earth radial axis per ~90 minute orbit. If the sail is spin-stabilized, this will require detuning its stability enough to enable polhode precession.
View parallel to the Sun-Earth radial axis shows satellites launched above 800 km continually thrusting to (over the course of a couple of months) raise their orbit beyond that of the Moon and escape.

Once out of Earth’s sphere of influence, they employ the same orbit raising “tack” to track outwards towards Mars. Using their small but continuous thrust they can be launched any time, regardless of launch windows, to arrive at Mars between 9 and 18 months after launch.

Once at Mars, the sails “heave to” near Sun-Mars L2, without getting anywhere near elliptical Mars orbits or Mars solar eclipse, which would shade the sail.

Diagram showing the locations of the 5 Lagrange or Libration points in a restricted 3 body system. Arrow color denotes point stability, with a few technical asterisks. Not to scale!

L2 is one of five Lagrange points, or points of relative gravitational stability in a two body system. Sun-Mars L2 is found about one million kilometers further from the Sun along the Sun-Mars radial. In this location, Mars’ gravity adds to the Sun’s enough that the orbital period is the same as Mars’, even though a body at this radial distance from the sun would generally have a longer period orbit. At this distance, Mars’ angular extent in the sky is about 0.007 radians, slightly larger than the apparent size of the Sun, which means that no sail convexity is required to have Mars absorb all the reflected light from any given sail.

L2 is stable in the axial plane perpendicular to the radial, but unstable in the radial direction. This is why JWST’s orbital insertion needed to be so precise! L1 and L2 satellites generally “orbit” their respective Lagrange points, forming a quasi circular path around the radial that can generalize to the interplanetary transport network. In other words, satellites “at L2” can occupy a substantial volume of space where their orbits are stable enough.

This diagram shows a pair of purple stable(ish) orbits around L1 and L2, each roughly 1,000,000 km from Mars. Satellites at Lagrange points (such as SOHO and JWST) generally orbit thusly. The pink line shows one orbit scribing the edge of an equipotential manifold surface that enables extremely low energy (though rather slow) transfers between L1 and L2, and indeed out of a planetary sphere of influence on both lower and higher orbits. This trick underlies the interplanetary transport network. Solar sails may use these manifolds as part of their powered Mars L2 insertion process.

For solar sails, we need to generalize a little bit more since the sails, once on station, would ideally live in a zone where solar pressure, centrifugal force, and gravity from the Sun and Mars are in balance. Since solar pressure provides an additional force outwards, the solar sail L2 zone is somewhat closer to Mars, and since the solar sail can adjust its force vector by changing its angle, the zone is quite large. We further restrict this zone to places where light reflected from the sail falls on Mars’ night side, and are left with a set of surfaces parameterized by the areal density of the solar sail. Despite this restriction, the volume available for sails to live is enormous compared to the surface area of a planet, so it is highly unlikely that even uncoordinated sails would ever collide or even shade each other.

How L2 generalizes under solar pressure with sails. Black shapes give orientation of sails in equilibrium, though circular orbits around the Mars-L2 axis are the more general form of the solution. Of this set, only the cases closest to Mars also result in reflected light falling back to the planet, so that’s where, ultimately, solar sails will be parked when used for terraforming.

It turns out that new technology, propulsion, space-based hydrogen bombs, and Mars cities need not be on the critical path for terraforming Mars. It cannot be overstated how much cheaper and easier it is to do as much of the mission as possible while still on the ground. Even if people living on Mars wanted to terraform the planet, the cheapest way would be to contract Earth-based groups to spam the Mars night sky with solar sails.

28 thoughts on “How to terraform Mars for $10b in 10 years

  1. So, by using the proposed solar sails to heat Mars, what would be the expected temperature and climate conditions on Mars in 10 years? Is the 1% increase in temperature figure, from 120K to 212K, the 10-year result? How long for a temperature that allows for liquid water? Habitability? Atmosphere generation?


      1. I’m guessing you’ve terraformed other planets before to understand this problem right?? You’d never get to a point of quality before this would happen.


  2. Would this be an efficient way to move asteroids into more convenient locations for resourcing? Send up some mirrors and focus sunlight on spots that generate appropriate thrust when outgassing.


  3. Sorry, but no. Just off the top of my head: Your sails may be that light, but you need shrouds and controllers. Keeping 1.5 billion satellites oriented and not mutually interfering would be…challenging. And your manufacturing, packaging and launch costs are (imho) way too low.

    Lastly, my understanding of Mars is that there is no atmosphere just waiting to outgas from the regolith. It’s mostly *gone*.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. That’s my impression too. There’s lots of oxygen in ordinary rock, but it’s not going to outgas just from heating up the regolith. Turning it into molecular O2 would require the production of zillions of tons of metal.


  4. I’m wondering if a similar approach would work to *deflect* sunlight from Earth, with the sails placed at the Earth-Sun L1 point instead of L2. The impact would of course be small. One anti-global-warming measure to combine with lots of others…

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I have wondered the same before. Using mirrors in space to cool the Earth have been considered before, but always dismissed as building such a large mirror is impracticable. But these days you could build a constellation of thousands of satellites and steer them so the mirrors reflect sunlight away from Earth. I haven’t run the numbers on how much that would cool the Earth, but I suspect it is cheaper than many of the other proposed geoengineering approaches.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Recently learned about this idea of parking a relatively non-fantastical magnet in between Sun and Mars to shield it from the atmosphere-stripping solar wind in the absence of a planetary magnetic field.

    I think blocking the solar wind would affect some of the navigational physics of your sails but maybe by tuning things right (having the shield only block as little solar wind as possible) the magnetic shield could reduce the atmospheric stripping while remaining compatible with the reflector sails. I’m also not sure what time scales the solar wind strips the martian atmosphere.

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Dumping sulfur in the atmosphere is controversial. It’s the idea behind Neal Stephenson’s last book.

        Actually, I was thinking of this initiative:

        Their idea is to obfuscate 1.8% of the sunlight with silicon bubbles. Unclear on how they are going to keep the passive bubbles in place.

        Liked by 1 person

  6. Another thing that is not considered here, is how to clean up this mess after a sail’ controller goes out of order. Eventually we’ll have a huge graveyard, hundreds of tons of space trash, making Mars L2 essentially unusable, ready to fly away all over the solar system, waiting to meet a lone ISS, a satellite, or an interplanetary mission.


    1. L1, L2 and L3 are unstable. Any satellites that do start behaving erratically for any reason will leave the L2 area. We’ll just be littering the solar system even more than our discarded rocket bodies …


      1. Would rather deal with any planet on its own terms(perhaps live underground or under plastic domes(blisters as Sir Arthur C Clarke called them))…do not like the very time and money consuming idea of turning everything into Earth II…Read “Worldmakers” edited by Gardner Dozois for more ideas on this terraforming
        subject…good thought provoking article though…
        I’m a 73 year old science fiction FANatic who thinks that no one kept the science in science fiction like Sir Arthur C Clarke and the best of anything that was ever on television was the original(1959-64;watched when I was 10-15) The Twilight Zone. I got to know Rod Setting and his wife and two(2) daughters and wouldn’t change that for anything(not even more breath on my death bed!).

        Liked by 1 person

  7. Terraforming another planet would be irresponsible considering we still don’t know the average experience of most wild animals.


      1. Yes, let’s do it!!! I’m sure more great ideas will be birthed as long as we keep this topic a paramount priority.

        We will have to learn to terraform other planets.

        We will have to learn to create matter.

        Liked by 1 person

  8. The biggest flaw in this is Mars has little to no Magnetic field. As such the solar winds of the sun is stripping the atmosphere on Mars away including water. So many articles talk like this but whatever moisture found on mars need to be sealed. You will release it into the atmosphere by warming it by evaporation at a much faster rate then sublimation, hence it will never return and will disappear into the cosmos. The resource water on Mars is finite.


      1. If you’re talking purely about the H2O present on the planet, then I agree. And if you’re talking about atmospheric gases at the usual loss rate, then I agree. But Carrington-type events may carry away enough of the atmosphere to make colonization problematic. Colonizers likely have decades to centuries to work out a defense against them.

        So if colonization plans include boosting the Martian atmosphere, it seems the first order of business would be determining the true severity of the threat of solar storms. Developing a defense can come later, even after adding to the atmosphere; but it should be on the radar, to be designed/tested as technologies advance.

        Otherwise, we have our heads in the sand, hoping that the inevitable never comes.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s